They never could reason and the only people who believed this were laymen unfamiliar with how GPTs actually work.
At their core, they are very fancy prediction and probability engines. Thats it. They either predict the next word in a sentence or the next pixel in an image. Most times they are right, sometimes they are laughably wrong. Even calling them AI is a huge stretch.
ShadieAndSassy on
Makes sense, sometimes it can’t even summarize an article properly.
david76 on
I don’t disagree with the premise of the article, but when you’re testing an LLM “with a given math question” you’re unlikely to get good results.Â
4 Comments
They never could reason and the only people who believed this were laymen unfamiliar with how GPTs actually work.
At their core, they are very fancy prediction and probability engines. Thats it. They either predict the next word in a sentence or the next pixel in an image. Most times they are right, sometimes they are laughably wrong. Even calling them AI is a huge stretch.
Makes sense, sometimes it can’t even summarize an article properly.
I don’t disagree with the premise of the article, but when you’re testing an LLM “with a given math question” you’re unlikely to get good results.Â
Uh. Duh? No shit. New to LLMs?