tldr; Crypto advocates, including Rob Nelson, Wendy O, and John Deaton, challenge Senator Elizabeth Warren’s critical stance on digital currency. They argue her criticisms may be a strategic move to benefit traditional banks and governments. Wendy O claims Warren is acting in her own interests, while Deaton provides evidence that only a small percentage of crypto is used illicitly. They highlight crypto’s potential for transparency and social good, contrasting Warren’s position as aligning with banking interests.
*This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.
1 Comment
tldr; Crypto advocates, including Rob Nelson, Wendy O, and John Deaton, challenge Senator Elizabeth Warren’s critical stance on digital currency. They argue her criticisms may be a strategic move to benefit traditional banks and governments. Wendy O claims Warren is acting in her own interests, while Deaton provides evidence that only a small percentage of crypto is used illicitly. They highlight crypto’s potential for transparency and social good, contrasting Warren’s position as aligning with banking interests.
*This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.