Two images, two days apart, perfectly capture the natural life cycle of large projects in Ireland.

https://www.reddit.com/gallery/1fv3sn0

Posted by Accomplished-Ad-6639

44 Comments

  1. “What’s today’s protest mary?”

    “Not sure Tom, but sure I said I’d get out of the house since the weather is nice”

    “Ah yeah, how are the kids ?”

    “They’re grand now, Colm has a new girlfriend”

    “Lovely, anyway, I’m off , I’ll be back next week to give out about planning permission, if the weather is nice”

  2. I don’t think I’ve ever seen so many Karen-shaped heads in one photo.

    Nearly every single one of them the quintessential Karen.

  3. SirJoePininfarina on

    We have a major problem with our attitude to change in this country. Literally nothing worth doing is unopposed, there’s this assumption that change is bad but the same people complain nothing ever changes.

    Anywhere that’s consistently improving things for their citizens does so by assuming change is good and embracing it. Trying out new power sources, trying out new infrastructure, using technology to solve problems.

    Whereas this shower of numbskulls are opposing a FUCKING BATTERY simply existing near them.

  4. Ireland says no to the services we use. We need to find ways to provide services without infrastructure. Surely to god, with modern technology they can magic power into my TV without needing cables. Why hasn’t transporter technology been used in toilets yet? That Colm Meaney fella invented them decades ago.

  5. “Stop that thing we have no idea about” – drives a car with loads of things they have no idea about, uses electricity delivered by tech they have no idea about, uses a phone with software they have no idea about, eats food they have idea what is in it, takes medicine they have no idea about, goes to doctors giving advice they have no idea about. It’s baffling how many people are proud to say they are against stuff they just don’t know anything about. If their position was “we want to preserve green areas” I could get it or if they were saying protect some endangered animal, sure but their suggestion here is just that is “untested”. What the fuck do they want? Scientific papers? There are loads of papers providing more than enough info to prove that these batteries are cost effective at storing power with the downside that they can’t discharge quickly, that’s it. No safety concerns from any peer reviewed papers, no environmental or safety concerns. I really hate this shit.

  6. What’s their issue with the battery storage? Why *is*it being trialled in Buncrana of all places? 

  7. You know I have a bit of sympathy for people who go all NIMBY on things that are genuinely big visual changes like a massive windfarm or a skyscraper. I get that the disruption of seeing a dramatic change in the landscape you’re used to is hard for some people to deal with. I disagree but I can empathise.

    This however is just pure twattery. Fear of something you don’t understand and basing your opinion on whatever conspiratorial lunatic you can find to back you up.

  8. JealousInevitable544 on

    How do we know the dog is opposed?

    It looks like he’s being held there against his will.

  9. Aah yes, putting kids in the front for emotional blackmail. Jaysus, nothing will ever change in this country.

  10. Apprehensive_Ratio80 on

    Half the people in that photo are children ffs when did it become popular to bring your kids to protests 🤦🏻‍♂️🤦🏻‍♂️

    Anyway you factor out the children who probably have no idea what they are doing there and certainly no idea about dangers or lack thereof of energy storage and you have about a dozen ppl so nothing major to worry about

  11. I’m from Buncrana and this place has a serious problem of people just wanting absolutely nothing to change or improve but then continue to complain about the town not getting any business or development opportunities

  12. Two thoughts

    1. Nimbyism is an unwanted effect of a very positive thing, full rights to publicly declare opinions on development.
    – You do not want the opposite of this in the same way you don’t want the country choked with effective nimby campaigns.

    2. Lodging submissions on proposed developments does not automatically mean anything, be it an extension or a battery facility, will be denied. They have to find valid environmental or planning procedure mishaps for their rationale

  13. Everyone of them including most of the kids most likely a battery in their pocket 🤖

  14. Iron-air batteries are actually safer than other types of batteries. No/very low risk of fire, non-toxic, no risk of overcharging etc. It’s still early days for iron-air batteries but everything points to them being very safe and well suited for grid-energy storage of intermittent energy sources like wind or solar.

    It’s funny because traditional battery storage are more dangerous than iron-air batteries if something goes wrong. These are probably the same people who think 5g cell towers cause cancer.

  15. >Key Concerns:
    * Potential harmful radiation
    * Contamination and pollution of local streams that our animals rely on
    * Destruction of wildlife habitats in the forestry area planned for deforestation
    * Devaluation of our homes and land

    Radiation? If people are concerned about being a few kilometers away from a non-ionising EMF source they should rip the wiring out of their homes.
    As for the environment thing, they’re felling commercial Sitka to build this… and the site is also 1km from a large quarry. They probably should be protesting that too.

  16. garygunning1984 on

    Not saying it’s right but you look at the high speed rail infrastructure china has put in place recently and they just plough through

  17. Birdinhandandbush on

    Simple solution.

    We pull all electrical cables out of Buncrana. We pull all 3G/4G masts and do not install 5G (god forbid).

    “No future energy storage systems” has to be the most fucking backwards bonkers statement I’ve seen in a long time.

    Back to the stone age with ye fucking muck donkeys.

  18. Missing one that says council rejects because it will change the neighborhood’s characteristics

  19. Ignoring the NIMBYs for a second here, one GIGAWATT hour? This thing will store energy for up to one hundred hours?!? Can we have ten more of these and achieve complete energy independence, please?

  20. This is the life cycle of only about 10% of large projects in Ireland. Most of them don’t get started _regardless_ of what NIMBYs think.

  21. I’m a bog dweller and very rural in my habits but this shit annoys me in the last few years around me there’s been groups opposing windfarms, solar farms, 5g masts, anaerobic digest, brown people living in their communities, social housing, and flood defence work

    Like I’ve my criticisms of the ownership model of infrastructure projects, I’d rather see the state or the communities own them but all the opposition is just a knee jerk new = bad from people who the next day will complain about the lack of investment in the area before they go back to opposing anything new.

    About the only new things that didn’t get opposed was a new McDonald’s last year

  22. It’s literally based on rust. I’m pretty sure Buncrana knows plenty about rust. It’s been tried and tested for a very long time.

  23. I’ve no problem whatsoever with people objecting.

    I do have a problem with unfounded objections being taken seriously. If any individuals or groups can provide data from any reputable source that indicates an issue with a new development, they must be listened to. If not, the objection should be promptly & summarily binned. You don’t delay a project on the basis of “Well, I don’t know there isn’t a problem…”

  24. scannerdarkley on

    If these people had a voice as loud as this, back in the day, we’d have no:

    * **Electricity:** “power lines are dangerous, heavy electricity falls out of lines and kills people”

    * **Internet:** “the modem noises are satanic”

    * **Mobile phones:** “~~2G/3G/4G/~~ 5G masts are emitting radiation”

    * **Batteries:** “We don’t want them, because….reasons”. All while ignoring all the batteries in their phones, laptops, cars even the airpods attached to their stupid faces.

    These people would burn themselves to death if they heard that Fire Alarms have radioactive elements in them.

  25. Reminds me of the gobshites who opposed the the Apple data centre in Athenry when the place needs the boost