Based

https://i.redd.it/2syebuffkgrd1.jpeg

Posted by UNITED24Media

13 Comments

  1. Spanish-American War  

    Russo-Japanese War

    Korean War(America and China)  

    Falkland Islands War 

    Snyder is a good cheerleader but horrible historian. There have been many instances in history where two sides fought only on the land fought over to prevent a wider conflict.

    Since America is keeping Ukraine alive their stake is huge and they will use that to further their interests. 

  2. We need to hand them the missles they need, look the other way, And let them boys do their job. Russia can’t handle more heat at this point, they are spread so thin.

  3. I see both sides. I am for Urkraine taking some of the hurt and damage to the aggressor but I understand that the US is trying to avoid WW III as well. Unfortunately you can’t successfully mollify thugs at some point the West will have to deal with Iran and Russia as the longer we allow these aggressions the bigger the cost when our hand is forced. Did we learn nothing from pacifying Hitler?

  4. Imagine for a moment what would happen if Central America attacked North America. Would all measures remain within North American borders?

  5. However at no time in history has so much been at stake, either. I can see both sides to the argument, but I think it is in fact time to allow the strikes.

  6. What a dumb quote, doesn’t he know that when Pearl Harbor was attacked we fought all of WWII on US soil? We didn’t want escalation, too risky 😬

  7. Look at the pedigree of our NSC and their record of “success.” It’s like someone appointed a weatherman from an Ivy League background in badminton.