Everything is a submarine if you’re brave enough, right?
single_use_12345 on
spoiler: is not the type of controlled sunk – that submarines love to do.
MagosFarnsworth on
Task failed succesfully
snowstorm556 on
I’m not gonna lie china. You surrounding your self with russia and north korea as your buddies really put a military damper on your progression. Its like surrounding your self with a bunch of crack heads and expecting not to get brain rot.
upvoatsforall on
It’s a submarine. Isn’t that what it’s supposed to do?
funwithdesign on
Submarine commanders hate this one easy trick
jimbozzzzz on
It’s cracked the submerging bit
ExoticSterby42 on
Was it made of carbon fiber?
ausmomo on
I believe the front fell off
Ser_Danksalot on
Spoiler alert. Every nation that’s had a substantial submarine program has had a sub sink in dock during testing. It didn’t stop any nation from continuing their submarine programs.
BeneficialExpert6524 on
As long as it wasn’t a Boeing and the door didn’t pop off, I say good
autotldr on
This is the best tl;dr I could make, [original](https://www.cbsnews.com/news/china-nuclear-attack-submarine-sank-us-officials-says/) reduced by 83%. (I’m a bot)
*****
> Satellite imagery showed that China's newest nuclear-powered attack submarine sank alongside a pier while under construction, a U.S. military official confirmed to CBS News on Thursday.
> The submarine likely sank between May and June, when satellite images showed cranes that would be necessary to lift it off the bottom of the river, said the official, who spoke on condition of anonymity to provide details about the submarine loss.
> Thomas Shugart, a former U.S. Navy submariner and an analyst at the Center for a New American Security, first noticed the incident involving the submarine in July, though it wasn't publicly known at the time that it involved the new Zhou-class vessel.
When the sub factory buys their welding rods at Temu…..
Dude_I_got_a_DWAVE on
“You thought we didn’t know about your attempts to steal secrets? Yeah, we modified them a bit before your mole handed them over”
Sincerely,
CIA
SelectiveEmpath on
Not sunk, just doing joint drills with the Moskva
Kaito__1412 on
Advanced metallurgy remains a problem for the Chinese. They’ve obviously improved significantly, but the level that the US Industry can pull off remains a bar too high for them in this sector.
WangMangDonkeyChain on
mr cha bu duo class submarine is good enough
transexualtrex on
wouldn’t the best stealth submarine trick you into thinking it sunk? while it’s actually… RIGHT BEHIND YOU!!
TheGreatSpaceWizard on
RIP to those poor brave sailors.
hippodribble on
Metal is kinda heavy.
camtliving on
I miss my old job in the submarine Intel community. Guarantee we knew about this as it was happening.
whereameyeat on
that what submarines do, sink then float, sink then float….
scuppered_polaris on
Wonder if that’s where the mysterious missile came from the other day
Noktyrn on
Guys that’s not a problem. It’s supposed to sink by design, which they nailed. It’s the failed un-sinking system that is the problem. /s
neon-god8241 on
China forgot to steal the owners manual I suppose.
KeyGroundbreaking390 on
“Build me straight, O worthy Master!
Stanch and strong, a goodly vessel,
That shall laugh at all disaster,
And with wave and whirlwind wrestle!”
–Longfellow
mixelplix1_outlook on
Now you know what it’s like to get cheap crap from China, China.
Rambling_Lunatic on
Probably forgot to steal the design for the ballast control system.
ConstantStatistician on
> An image taken June 15 appears to show the submarine either fully or partially submerged just under the river’s surface, with rescue equipment and cranes surrounding it.
Not the best evidence. The dark shape looks like a crane’s shadow.
eureka123 on
> sank alongside a pier while under construction
0011001100111000 on
Still technically works, it’s just single-use.
Dockers4flag2035orB4 on
I think the fact it didn’t surface is more a problem.
Spare_Substance5003 on
Submarines are suppose to sink.
fakeairpods on
Chinese steel. Not the best quality.
schlitz91 on
Should have never outsourced the doors to Poland
Mors1473 on
Made In China
Jannol on
So if even China’s military equipment and their nuclear armed forces aren’t well maintained then imagine Russia’s.
Then again incompetency is inevitable under Authoritarian regimes and Trump should take note.
TheGambit on
A submarine can’t really sink; it just becomes an underwater base. “Sorry for the inconvenience, but we’re still fully operational—just more committed to our mission of submersion”
PMzyox on
Oh? All by itself? While we watched curiously?
Oversidee on
how many times is this news going to be posted lmao? it’s like the 6th one I saw in the last 24h and I barely check reddit
ElGuano on
I mean, this one will sink, but do you think China will give up? They’ll make another one, and they’ll get it right. Then they’ll make 500 of them.
42 Comments
Everything is a submarine if you’re brave enough, right?
spoiler: is not the type of controlled sunk – that submarines love to do.
Task failed succesfully
I’m not gonna lie china. You surrounding your self with russia and north korea as your buddies really put a military damper on your progression. Its like surrounding your self with a bunch of crack heads and expecting not to get brain rot.
It’s a submarine. Isn’t that what it’s supposed to do?
Submarine commanders hate this one easy trick
It’s cracked the submerging bit
Was it made of carbon fiber?
I believe the front fell off
Spoiler alert. Every nation that’s had a substantial submarine program has had a sub sink in dock during testing. It didn’t stop any nation from continuing their submarine programs.
As long as it wasn’t a Boeing and the door didn’t pop off, I say good
This is the best tl;dr I could make, [original](https://www.cbsnews.com/news/china-nuclear-attack-submarine-sank-us-officials-says/) reduced by 83%. (I’m a bot)
*****
> Satellite imagery showed that China's newest nuclear-powered attack submarine sank alongside a pier while under construction, a U.S. military official confirmed to CBS News on Thursday.
> The submarine likely sank between May and June, when satellite images showed cranes that would be necessary to lift it off the bottom of the river, said the official, who spoke on condition of anonymity to provide details about the submarine loss.
> Thomas Shugart, a former U.S. Navy submariner and an analyst at the Center for a New American Security, first noticed the incident involving the submarine in July, though it wasn't publicly known at the time that it involved the new Zhou-class vessel.
*****
[**Extended Summary**](http://np.reddit.com/r/autotldr/comments/1fqlloh/new_chinese_nuclear_attack_submarine_sank_us/) | [FAQ](http://np.reddit.com/r/autotldr/comments/31b9fm/faq_autotldr_bot/ “Version 2.02, ~694435 tl;drs so far.”) | [Feedback](http://np.reddit.com/message/compose?to=%23autotldr “PM’s and comments are monitored, constructive feedback is welcome.”) | *Top* *keywords*: **submarine**^#1 **China**^#2 **U.S.**^#3 **New**^#4 **show**^#5
Made in China. Hmmm
When the sub factory buys their welding rods at Temu…..
“You thought we didn’t know about your attempts to steal secrets? Yeah, we modified them a bit before your mole handed them over”
Sincerely,
CIA
Not sunk, just doing joint drills with the Moskva
Advanced metallurgy remains a problem for the Chinese. They’ve obviously improved significantly, but the level that the US Industry can pull off remains a bar too high for them in this sector.
mr cha bu duo class submarine is good enough
wouldn’t the best stealth submarine trick you into thinking it sunk? while it’s actually… RIGHT BEHIND YOU!!
RIP to those poor brave sailors.
Metal is kinda heavy.
I miss my old job in the submarine Intel community. Guarantee we knew about this as it was happening.
that what submarines do, sink then float, sink then float….
Wonder if that’s where the mysterious missile came from the other day
Guys that’s not a problem. It’s supposed to sink by design, which they nailed. It’s the failed un-sinking system that is the problem. /s
China forgot to steal the owners manual I suppose.
“Build me straight, O worthy Master!
Stanch and strong, a goodly vessel,
That shall laugh at all disaster,
And with wave and whirlwind wrestle!”
–Longfellow
Now you know what it’s like to get cheap crap from China, China.
Probably forgot to steal the design for the ballast control system.
> An image taken June 15 appears to show the submarine either fully or partially submerged just under the river’s surface, with rescue equipment and cranes surrounding it.
Not the best evidence. The dark shape looks like a crane’s shadow.
> sank alongside a pier while under construction
Still technically works, it’s just single-use.
I think the fact it didn’t surface is more a problem.
Submarines are suppose to sink.
Chinese steel. Not the best quality.
Should have never outsourced the doors to Poland
Made In China
So if even China’s military equipment and their nuclear armed forces aren’t well maintained then imagine Russia’s.
Then again incompetency is inevitable under Authoritarian regimes and Trump should take note.
A submarine can’t really sink; it just becomes an underwater base. “Sorry for the inconvenience, but we’re still fully operational—just more committed to our mission of submersion”
Oh? All by itself? While we watched curiously?
how many times is this news going to be posted lmao? it’s like the 6th one I saw in the last 24h and I barely check reddit
I mean, this one will sink, but do you think China will give up? They’ll make another one, and they’ll get it right. Then they’ll make 500 of them.