*”She pushes policies that boost good jobs nationwide by embracing technology and clean energy. She supports education, public health and reproductive rights. She treats the climate crisis as the emergency it is and seeks to mitigate its catastrophic storms, fires and droughts.”*
It’s sadly ironic that the OTHER candidate doesn’t believe in those same things. It should be a battle over who believes in them more, not believe them or reject them.
The other candidate REJECTS those core beliefs.
AlenaGlowing on
It’s great to see Scientific American taking a clear stance on issues that impact us all
4 Comments
A little mystery:
They don’t say who the other endorsement was for.
With that time span, it could be Abraham Lincoln.
*”She pushes policies that boost good jobs nationwide by embracing technology and clean energy. She supports education, public health and reproductive rights. She treats the climate crisis as the emergency it is and seeks to mitigate its catastrophic storms, fires and droughts.”*
It’s sadly ironic that the OTHER candidate doesn’t believe in those same things. It should be a battle over who believes in them more, not believe them or reject them.
The other candidate REJECTS those core beliefs.
It’s great to see Scientific American taking a clear stance on issues that impact us all
Nice to see SA taking a stand against fascism.