Gary Stevenson claims to have been the best trader in the world. His old colleagues disagree

https://www.ft.com/content/7e8b47b3-7931-4354-9e8a-47d75d057fff

Posted by AdSoft6392

26 Comments

  1. They will give anyone a column in the Grauniad, these days.

    Pro-tip – don’t brag to the world when every other fucker (in an extremely competitive environment) you’ve worked with either saw your numbers or had a fairly accurate idea of the ‘conservative’ high-end for your work.

  2. At least he isn’t positioning himself as a teacher on how to trade is he?

    His book is funny and will echo the experience of anyone who has spent time on a trading floor.

  3. marquess_rostrevor on

    I’m the greatest trader that ever lived, just don’t ask for statements or references please.

  4. I’ve seen a few of his videos / snippets. He seems to focus on wider societal and macroeconomic issues. I’m not sure why him being a good trader means that I should listen to him any more or less than anyone tbh. I do agree with some of his arguments and not others, but whether I agree or not is fully based on the merits of the argument he makes.

  5. HorseBarrierRoad on

    Hopefully we can now move beyond the absolute brainouts thinking they know anything about economics having watched a few of his videos.

  6. Unusual_Reference_14 on

    Honestly when you listen to this guy’s stories he’s making half of it up.  

    You start off with something half true and then use things you’ve seen around you to make it more sexy and glamorous and mad.

    Anyone who believes this guy is a moron imo.  I work for a hedge and surrounded by actual smart people and this guy isn’t that smart.  Hell I’ll go out on a limb and say I’m smarter than this guy.

    I think the reason he quit was because of a combination of he likely couldn’t handle it and had one lucky break and decided to just go out on a high.  Good luck to him.

    I don’t dislike the guy but he does come across as being full of shit.

  7. It’s so easy to stretch the truth and make yourself a social media influencer nowadays. Steven Bartlett playbook. Who cares if you tell a few white lies in the process of making millions from your audience.

  8. Electrical-Young-883 on

    Out of all the people to call out – they call Gary Stevenson out?

    The guy calling for investigation into where the covid money went? Investment into our people? Why our country is failing?

    Is this actually happening? He’s a great guy who, given the right powers could be of great use to this country.

  9. That took longer than expected! I’ve watched a bit of him and never heard him claim anything like he was the best trader in the world.

    Why not write articles disputing what he says?

  10. Every time I try to watch any of his videos I last about 2 minutes, he’s way too fidgety, constantly waving and moving and rocking, I cannot take it.

  11. Sounds more like he was the best on his desk for a year. but I still like Gary. At the end of the day though he wasn’t prop trading billions so its not like he can be the BEST trader in the world literally. But its entirely possible that for a year he could have been citybank’s most popular trader

  12. Sorry-Transition-780 on

    Really struggling to understand the actual point of this article. Okay so he wasn’t the best trader in the world ? So what? I don’t think that really does anything to discredit his current campaigning at all, nor does the article even try to make that argument. I’m sure he’s not the first trader to embellish the scale of their abilities in the game, nor would he be the last.

    He calls himself an ‘inequality Economist’ and most of his anecdotes about his time at Citibank are used to relate the message that the people controlling vast swathes of money in our economy are actually incredibly out of touch with reality and the lives of the working class. Exaggerating his ability as a trader doesn’t really affect this at all.

    To be honest, what stands out most here is the stuff they have confirmed to have happened that seemed unbelievable to start with. He did have a boss with a well known coke habit, he did get the job by winning a card game, these people really do think £35 million is spare change.

    His message is generally that inequality is bad and the systems supported by the likes of Citibank seek to further entrench that inequality. A capitalist economy functions poorly when wealth distribution is this unequal and money being directed undemocratically from the top does not serve society in the way we need it to.

    The biggest players in our economy being absolute clowns playing around with numbers is an actual issue with society. Democracy becomes a bit of a joke when so much of our resources in society are directed by card game winning coke fiends sat at a desk all day making money for the upper classes with no consideration at all for the wider effects of that.

  13. It was my understanding from an interview he gave (full disclosure) that for 1 year he was the highest earning trader at Citibank. He said himself that there were guys there who earned more than him most years.

    I don’t really get this. He’s not selling books on how to get rich quick or gatekeeping the secrets of successful trading.

  14. The FT is so good at calling out celebs for their bullshit…

    See the David Adjaye piece from a few years back

  15. I mean don’t we all lie on our CVs lol? I don’t really care if he was or wasn’t the best trader itw at one point, aside from that he makes some really good point about the state of this country, wealth inequality, COVID money etc…which should be what these media houses focuses on.

  16. It was always funny to me that some trading floor monkey at Citi managed to get himself such a huge social media following just by doing an exaggerated working class accent and saying “uwu I’m not like other bankers”

    His trading experience doesn’t even have anything to do with the macroeconomic issues he likes to opine about…

  17. When the financial media feels the need to try and take you down, you know you’re on to something.

    This guy has been pushing for a wealth tax, is it any surprise they want to discredit him?

  18. Honestly article is odd, I don’t remember the financial Times doing articles on people directly, looking through stuff that gets posted on reddit, It’s all economic/political/government stuff, this stands out like a sore thumb.

  19. [Called it 6 months ago.](https://www.reddit.com/r/unitedkingdom/comments/1b7imeg/he_made_millions_betting_against_economic/ktlqecx/)

    What he’ll do next: tell his audience that powerful, shadowy forces are working to undermine him and his message. That he knew this would happen, that the rich are worried and inevitably would look to underhand tactics to shut him down. Oh and that you can support him by subscribing and donating to the Patreon (strange that the world’s most successful trader would even need one) that he recently activated, having had it ready and waiting for months.

    If you believe any of his lies or subscribe to his sixth-form analysis, you’re just a mark for this grifter.

  20. If he is the world greatest trader why is he working for Citi Bank? Wouldn’t JP Morgan or Goldmans be the better fit for him?

  21. Yeah! Fuck him for trying to make a living while informing people about finance. We all need to come together and help the banks for once!

  22. Obviously embellishing stories is not good. But on the basis that he’s previously been informed that newspapers are ‘looking for dirt’ on him, and on the fact the FT have dedicated a very long article to a minor embellishment, I’d say he’s doing something right. Although pointing out fabrications is not inherently wrong, maybe the bigger picture should be a criticism of his increasingly popular macroeconomic views. After all, it’s a strange coincidence that papers like the FT and the others looking for dirt tend to prop up the wealthy that Gary is coming after.

  23. Uh, nobody gives a shit whether he’s the “best trader in the world” or not.

    His story is his credibility as an insider on ultra wealthy people who seem so alien to the rest of us normal ones. He peels back the curtain a bit and now these cunts are keen to hurl petty insults his way.

    It’s like a shit episode of Billions where bad rich guy pays big publication to discredit a guy who’s saying things he doesn’t like.

  24. He’s obviously a bit of a bulltshitter.

    I saw a long form (~20min) interview him and there was so much stuff that struck off as a nonsense.