Proof that Paedophiles get too much leniency in regards to their depravity.
Min_sora on
“Singh was issued with a child abduction notice not to contact her before a SHPO was imposed at Birmingham Magistrates’ Court, which he went on to breach by having sexual activity with her.”
Guy was gagging that badly to shag a 14-year-old that he spat straight into the law’s face and he’s getting a pissy punishment as a result of it.
“Judge Kershaw concluded Singh effectively ‘groomed’ the girl who would not have had the same ‘capacity as someone who is older’. But he acknowledged the defendant had stayed away from her as per the deferred sentence agreement, was working and ‘was otherwise leading a decent life’.”
Fuck off. I bet he stayed awat from her because he got the sex he wanted and he doesn’t want her with a baby. I don’t think this is him becoming a better human being.
csgymgirl on
Can someone explain this case to me please? He was given the SHPO after he got her pregnant? But then had sex with her again? Or he got her pregnant after the SHPO?
Additionally – the judge’s speech is really weird to me. He calls the age gap a problem like it’s not the actual age of the girl that’s the issue.
[deleted] on
[removed]
HotMachine9 on
This judge needs to be fired. What the fuck kind of sentence is that.
Oh the age gap is a problem not the fact that he’s a fucking paedophile
Danqazmlp0 on
I’m so confused with this sentencing. I genuinely don’t understand it.
LazarusOwenhart on
It’s not actually enormously uncommon for cases like this to result in non-custodial or suspended sentences and SHPOs. The cynic in me however believes that the reason this particular case is being reported is because the defendants surname is ‘Singh’ and not ‘Smith’.
8 Comments
[removed]
Proof that Paedophiles get too much leniency in regards to their depravity.
“Singh was issued with a child abduction notice not to contact her before a SHPO was imposed at Birmingham Magistrates’ Court, which he went on to breach by having sexual activity with her.”
Guy was gagging that badly to shag a 14-year-old that he spat straight into the law’s face and he’s getting a pissy punishment as a result of it.
“Judge Kershaw concluded Singh effectively ‘groomed’ the girl who would not have had the same ‘capacity as someone who is older’. But he acknowledged the defendant had stayed away from her as per the deferred sentence agreement, was working and ‘was otherwise leading a decent life’.”
Fuck off. I bet he stayed awat from her because he got the sex he wanted and he doesn’t want her with a baby. I don’t think this is him becoming a better human being.
Can someone explain this case to me please? He was given the SHPO after he got her pregnant? But then had sex with her again? Or he got her pregnant after the SHPO?
Additionally – the judge’s speech is really weird to me. He calls the age gap a problem like it’s not the actual age of the girl that’s the issue.
[removed]
This judge needs to be fired. What the fuck kind of sentence is that.
Oh the age gap is a problem not the fact that he’s a fucking paedophile
I’m so confused with this sentencing. I genuinely don’t understand it.
It’s not actually enormously uncommon for cases like this to result in non-custodial or suspended sentences and SHPOs. The cynic in me however believes that the reason this particular case is being reported is because the defendants surname is ‘Singh’ and not ‘Smith’.