It’s because Right-wingers also hate watch Kamala on top of her actual supporters which leads to higher viewership
Leraldoe on
Unhinged rant incoming
Top-Enthusiasm5634 on
Ketchup incoming in 3…2…
Minifig81 on
Uh oh. .
Who is going to be assigned ketchup clean up duty?
Chance_Papaya_6181 on
Super. Polls and ratings don’t win elections. Vote everyone. Tell your friends who don’t vote to vote this year.
NotCreative37 on
She is now the change candidate and Trump is old and stale.
IowaJL on
Part of it is probably because a lot of people were wanting to see if they’d fail.
Conversely, it’s not good TV when you know an interview with the other guy is *guaranteed* to fail.
TopEagle4012 on
No matter how well she did, they would deny it, lie about it, make things up, and swear that she said something that she never said. Fox News will back them up, and then it’ll spread on Newsmax, OANN, Breitbart, and spread it to all the right wing sociopaths, thugs and assorted goons.
The so-called good part about all of this is that the American public is getting a first-hand revisit to the late 1930s when the American Nazi party held a rally in Feb 1939 @ Madison Square Garden that drew over 20,000 people. So, for those of you who say it could never happen here, welcome to Project 2025, etc.
armchairmegalomaniac on
I guess viewers don’t enjoy watching senile old men babble incoherently. It’s unsettling.
robottiporo on
Nobody cares about Dementia Donald’s low energy rambling.
GeekAesthete on
Even putting enthusiasm aside, this should hardly be surprising.
For better or worse, the general public knows who Trump is. No one is tuning in to say “gee, I wonder what this guy is all about?”
But most Americans were paying little attention to Kamala Harris a little over month ago, and Walz just a couple weeks ago. There was inevitably going to be a lot more people tuning in just to learn more about them, especially for their first interview since replacing Biden.
Lysol3435 on
I understand that everyone is obsessed with ratings for interviews, because Trump is obsessed with them. But I’m worried that even when Trump is gone, this is how we will quantify the quality of an interview. Doesn’t matter how substantive or beneficial the questions or responses were. All that will matter is how well it rated
Just_Campaign_9833 on
All Trump cares about is ratings…
…this will cause rage posts!
Hwy39 on
And more whining from Donold
Oozlum-Bird on
He’s gonna love this 😉
1white26golf on
TLDR; Democrats watch the Democratic candidate on CNN. Democrats do not watch the Republican candidate on CNN.
siberianmi on
Of course they did, the Trump campaign has been hyping this interview for weeks.
ferrari20094 on
Higher ratings, larger crowds, more volunteers, far greater campaign contributions. This is why I think polling is massively under-estimating Kamala’s support. I’d say it’s more likely than not she takes every swing state.
greentea1985 on
Of course. Trump isn’t saying anything that he hasn’t said before. We all know who he is and what his shtick is. There’s very little that an interview could reveal. Harris and Walz are relatively unknown despite Harris being the VP for four years, so an interview with them matters as voters want to know more about them.
Ryanlester5789 on
Trump used to be must watch TV, now he’s just playing the hits for the fan base.
CurrentlyLucid on
trump needs more national media to show off his incompetence.
lahuman8 on
“Were the Harris-Walz Interview Ratings Too High?” – nytimes, probably
lala_b11 on
Trump in shambles rn
samwstew on
Ketchup on the walls of mar a lardo tonight
stayonthecloud on
Dana Bash was horrible in this interview, using a bunch of right wing manufactured controversies and wasting time that could have been spent on policy discussion and differentiation with the other side. Like the bullshit about Tim’s service record? Not surprising from CNN but still depressing to see.
That said, I am full of glee any time Trump gets crushed in the ratings because his pathetic ego can’t handle it.
meaningfulusername91 on
I wish media would talk about policy and track records instead of polls and ratings
dattru on
Trump is a has been. His best days are behind him. He is too old to be president or even relevant in political life
deviousmajik on
Cue Obama’s crowd size hand gesture gif.
feral-pug on
Everyone’s sick of Trump’s tired, old, weird, dumb ass and his lame schtick. He’s been stuck on repeat for years and has nothing new or interesting to say… Just the same complaining and moaning.
yesyes7776 on
How was the interview. I can’t get through the trolls to actually get a clear picture.
jetylee on
Record breaking amount of people said “I need to see this shit!”
TreeLooksFamiliar22 on
No fare trolling the MAGAs with posts like this!
ParkMan73 on
What I enjoyed about the interview is that we saw two smart, capable, decent people with ideas and a vision for the future.
For the first time in a long time, I’m actually hopeful for what they can do.
SpaceTimeinFlux on
I love hearing the absolutely pathetic cope from right wing propaganda mills.
Numbers dont lie. Donny is cancelled.
ObnoxiousTwit on
Does Don have anything new to say, or is it just the same tired, old grievances of the past 8 years with equal parts incoherent rambling?
36 Comments
That is why duo interview is good idea.
It’s because Right-wingers also hate watch Kamala on top of her actual supporters which leads to higher viewership
Unhinged rant incoming
Ketchup incoming in 3…2…
Uh oh. .
Who is going to be assigned ketchup clean up duty?
Super. Polls and ratings don’t win elections. Vote everyone. Tell your friends who don’t vote to vote this year.
She is now the change candidate and Trump is old and stale.
Part of it is probably because a lot of people were wanting to see if they’d fail.
Conversely, it’s not good TV when you know an interview with the other guy is *guaranteed* to fail.
No matter how well she did, they would deny it, lie about it, make things up, and swear that she said something that she never said. Fox News will back them up, and then it’ll spread on Newsmax, OANN, Breitbart, and spread it to all the right wing sociopaths, thugs and assorted goons.
The so-called good part about all of this is that the American public is getting a first-hand revisit to the late 1930s when the American Nazi party held a rally in Feb 1939 @ Madison Square Garden that drew over 20,000 people. So, for those of you who say it could never happen here, welcome to Project 2025, etc.
I guess viewers don’t enjoy watching senile old men babble incoherently. It’s unsettling.
Nobody cares about Dementia Donald’s low energy rambling.
Even putting enthusiasm aside, this should hardly be surprising.
For better or worse, the general public knows who Trump is. No one is tuning in to say “gee, I wonder what this guy is all about?”
But most Americans were paying little attention to Kamala Harris a little over month ago, and Walz just a couple weeks ago. There was inevitably going to be a lot more people tuning in just to learn more about them, especially for their first interview since replacing Biden.
I understand that everyone is obsessed with ratings for interviews, because Trump is obsessed with them. But I’m worried that even when Trump is gone, this is how we will quantify the quality of an interview. Doesn’t matter how substantive or beneficial the questions or responses were. All that will matter is how well it rated
All Trump cares about is ratings…
…this will cause rage posts!
And more whining from Donold
He’s gonna love this 😉
TLDR; Democrats watch the Democratic candidate on CNN. Democrats do not watch the Republican candidate on CNN.
Of course they did, the Trump campaign has been hyping this interview for weeks.
Higher ratings, larger crowds, more volunteers, far greater campaign contributions. This is why I think polling is massively under-estimating Kamala’s support. I’d say it’s more likely than not she takes every swing state.
Of course. Trump isn’t saying anything that he hasn’t said before. We all know who he is and what his shtick is. There’s very little that an interview could reveal. Harris and Walz are relatively unknown despite Harris being the VP for four years, so an interview with them matters as voters want to know more about them.
Trump used to be must watch TV, now he’s just playing the hits for the fan base.
trump needs more national media to show off his incompetence.
“Were the Harris-Walz Interview Ratings Too High?” – nytimes, probably
Trump in shambles rn
Ketchup on the walls of mar a lardo tonight
Dana Bash was horrible in this interview, using a bunch of right wing manufactured controversies and wasting time that could have been spent on policy discussion and differentiation with the other side. Like the bullshit about Tim’s service record? Not surprising from CNN but still depressing to see.
That said, I am full of glee any time Trump gets crushed in the ratings because his pathetic ego can’t handle it.
I wish media would talk about policy and track records instead of polls and ratings
Trump is a has been. His best days are behind him. He is too old to be president or even relevant in political life
Cue Obama’s crowd size hand gesture gif.
Everyone’s sick of Trump’s tired, old, weird, dumb ass and his lame schtick. He’s been stuck on repeat for years and has nothing new or interesting to say… Just the same complaining and moaning.
How was the interview. I can’t get through the trolls to actually get a clear picture.
Record breaking amount of people said “I need to see this shit!”
No fare trolling the MAGAs with posts like this!
What I enjoyed about the interview is that we saw two smart, capable, decent people with ideas and a vision for the future.
For the first time in a long time, I’m actually hopeful for what they can do.
I love hearing the absolutely pathetic cope from right wing propaganda mills.
Numbers dont lie. Donny is cancelled.
Does Don have anything new to say, or is it just the same tired, old grievances of the past 8 years with equal parts incoherent rambling?
Yeah, that’s what I thought.