Trump indicted again in federal election interference case following the Supreme Court immunity ruling

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/justice-department/trump-indicted-federal-election-interference-case-supreme-court-immuni-rcna168503

31 Comments

  1. Meaning? New ruling by Supreme Court coming, making sure their orange turd is really immune for anything. Anything.

  2. fancychoicetaken on

    It’s a short article but a great one.

    TL;DR

    Jack Smith got a wholly separate Grand Jury to re-indict Trump on the same 4 charges post SCOTUS immunity ruling.

    Can’t wait to see Judge Chutkin get this ball rolling

  3. I don’t have much hope for justice being served in these cases, but, if the Rule of Law is to have any meaning whatsoever, one has to try.

  4. Thank the lord he’s being held accountable for his crimes once again. God bless Jack Smith. What a true patriot.

  5. sh4desthevibe on

    I’m taking immense personal satisfaction in the fact that the effort to try to get the phony “COVID censorship” narrative to stick today has completely been undone by all the “Trump indicted” coverage we’re going to see.

  6. Sorry to ask this, but why are we pursuing this now? I’m not disagreeing it should be pursued, but why can’t we kick this guy to the curb on 11/6 first, then lock him up?

    In some ways it’s gonna look like we’re desperate to get him out of the election.

  7. I can’t wait to see what they end up calling this trial because I know they won’t call it election interference.

  8. To put this simply for lay people:

    Jack Smith (aka US Govt) charged Trump with election interference.

    Supreme Court says that presidents are immune in official acts.

    Jack Smith brought the same charges to a new grand jury and argued that these charges have nothing to do with official acts. Grand jury agrees, so Trump has been re-indicted with the same charges. Same judge.

  9. Is holding a gala for the people convicted of helping you with the crime you’re accused of a good look?

  10. Alternative-Half-783 on

    Just my opinion…..but quit indicting again if you’re not gonna throw his ass in prison. You’re wasting taxpayer money.

  11. SoggyBoysenberry7703 on

    Yeah, cause everything he did wrong was NOT A DUTY OF THE PRESIDENT. It’s why it was a CRIME.

  12. To provide leniency, sweep charges under the rug, and not treat a candidate as any other citizen would be election interference, not the other way around.

    The American people have a right to an informed vote.

  13. No matter how infuriating this process has been due to Cannon and SCOTUS, it’s goddamn hilarious that this dude just keeps getting indicted.

  14. Fast-Pineapple-430 on

    I please with all of you to get a hobby and stop thinking about Trump so much. This man rules all of you

  15. It’s not even October yet, and he still hasn’t faced sentencing for his previous felony convictions. Because he’s still a convicted felon.