How about to capture the government…. oh no porn is more clickable…
Moist_Albatross_5434 on
We’ll just make our own porn with your sexually frustrated wives, pussies.
MintBerryCrunchJr on
Many people say the government is going to go door to door taking VHS tapes and DVDs. They’ll have to pry them from our sticky patriotic hands!
CaptainAxiomatic on
The right whingers are the most prolific consumers. What is the strategy, here?
Besides, VPNs exist.
armchairmegalomaniac on
Creepy, lonely men somehow managed to get together for long enough to write Project 2025. It reads like the perviest hentai fantasy. It’s a desire for total control over other people’s bodies. Thanks basement dwellers, but I’m good. We’re good. Stop bugging us weirdos.
conspiracy_troll on
In Louisianistan, we need an online picture id to access porn. It’s already starting.
OppositeDifference on
But like… .why even?
I can confidently make the statement that Republicans probably account for just as much per capita porn site traffic as Americans. Talk about cutting off your nose to spite your wank.
And if you’re wondering, yes the wording up there was deliberate. All of it.
BobB104 on
He wants to return to the golden age of censorship. Never saw a book that he wasn’t willing to burn.
sancoro on
Wild read —
“We’d have a national ban on pornography if we could, right?” he added. Vought contributed a chapter to the [Project 2025 manifesto](https://static.project2025.org/2025_MandateForLeadership_FULL.pdf) that argues that all pornography “should be outlawed” and its producers “imprisoned.”
sugarlessdeathbear on
Porn is covered under the first amendment.
HandsomePistachio on
Do Republicans actually want this? They’ll claim to want it because they think it makes them seem more godly and virtuous, but we all know they use porn too.
No-Attitude-6049 on
What’s next? Socks?
HeyTuesdayPigInAPoke on
It’s worse than banning porn.
They’re using this as a backdoor to imprison librarians, transgender people, drag queens, publishers, and anyone else who distributes LGBT positive comments or content to anyone under the age of 18.
It’s far more insidious than simply “banning porn”.
Straight from the project 2025 handbook.
>Pornography, manifested today in the omnipresent propagation of transgender
ideology and sexualization of children, for instance, is not a political Gordian knot
inextricably binding up disparate claims about free speech, property rights, sexual
liberation, and child welfare. It has no claim to First Amendment protection. Its
purveyors are child predators and misogynistic exploiters of women. Their product
is as addictive as any illicit drug and as psychologically destructive as any crime.
Pornography should be outlawed. The people who produce and distribute it should
be imprisoned. Educators and public librarians who purvey it should be classed
as registered sex offenders. And telecommunications and technology firms that
facilitate its spread should be shuttered.
CrotchoMan on
“MY FREEDOM TO CONTROL YOU”
-Republicans entire ideology
The people voting for Trump can live under Project 2025’s rule. They truly deserve it. The rest of us will mind our own business and make the world a better place.
Decent-Friend7996 on
I thought they loved porn?
Taxman2906 on
Just lost the Incel vote
peonoftheeon on
I’m sure they’re telling themselves that as soon as they pass this invasive law, their OWN porn-addictions will improve!
AnAcctWithoutPurpose on
Why do I get the impression it was written by a bunch of incels who bemoan no women would want to sleep with them, or even let them peek at their naked bodies and so they decided if they can’t get any, no one can? 🤔
acrylicsunrise on
Uh, anyone think it’s suspect he has such an interest in Photography (see pic)?
smugfruitplate on
“If they got rid of porn there’d be one website left and it’d be called ‘bring back the porn'”- Perry Cox, MD.
WateryTartLivinaLake on
They want to redefine lifestyles they don’t agree with as “porn”, and then persecute anyone who doesn’t espouse their approved lifestyle. That’s what this is about.
sonostanco72 on
The same authors and supporters of Project 2025 are the same people who get caught committing the very acts they want to ban.
CommissionVirtual763 on
That could be anything from actual porn to a girl showing her ankles in public.
PolarDorsai on
Yea, it was never about ACTUALLY banning porn. They love porn, as most people probably do, but it’s a code for: “loophole we can use to imprison and exterminate the LGBT+ community.”
26 Comments
Poor, pitiful creep.
Ties in with Vance statements:
* https://www.huffpost.com/entry/jd-vance-senate-pornography_n_628d3ba1e4b05cfc2692705b
Article archived at https://archive.is/QFAKn
How about to capture the government…. oh no porn is more clickable…
We’ll just make our own porn with your sexually frustrated wives, pussies.
Many people say the government is going to go door to door taking VHS tapes and DVDs. They’ll have to pry them from our sticky patriotic hands!
The right whingers are the most prolific consumers. What is the strategy, here?
Besides, VPNs exist.
Creepy, lonely men somehow managed to get together for long enough to write Project 2025. It reads like the perviest hentai fantasy. It’s a desire for total control over other people’s bodies. Thanks basement dwellers, but I’m good. We’re good. Stop bugging us weirdos.
In Louisianistan, we need an online picture id to access porn. It’s already starting.
But like… .why even?
I can confidently make the statement that Republicans probably account for just as much per capita porn site traffic as Americans. Talk about cutting off your nose to spite your wank.
And if you’re wondering, yes the wording up there was deliberate. All of it.
He wants to return to the golden age of censorship. Never saw a book that he wasn’t willing to burn.
Wild read —
“We’d have a national ban on pornography if we could, right?” he added. Vought contributed a chapter to the [Project 2025 manifesto](https://static.project2025.org/2025_MandateForLeadership_FULL.pdf) that argues that all pornography “should be outlawed” and its producers “imprisoned.”
Porn is covered under the first amendment.
Do Republicans actually want this? They’ll claim to want it because they think it makes them seem more godly and virtuous, but we all know they use porn too.
What’s next? Socks?
It’s worse than banning porn.
They’re using this as a backdoor to imprison librarians, transgender people, drag queens, publishers, and anyone else who distributes LGBT positive comments or content to anyone under the age of 18.
It’s far more insidious than simply “banning porn”.
Straight from the project 2025 handbook.
>Pornography, manifested today in the omnipresent propagation of transgender
ideology and sexualization of children, for instance, is not a political Gordian knot
inextricably binding up disparate claims about free speech, property rights, sexual
liberation, and child welfare. It has no claim to First Amendment protection. Its
purveyors are child predators and misogynistic exploiters of women. Their product
is as addictive as any illicit drug and as psychologically destructive as any crime.
Pornography should be outlawed. The people who produce and distribute it should
be imprisoned. Educators and public librarians who purvey it should be classed
as registered sex offenders. And telecommunications and technology firms that
facilitate its spread should be shuttered.
“MY FREEDOM TO CONTROL YOU”
-Republicans entire ideology
The people voting for Trump can live under Project 2025’s rule. They truly deserve it. The rest of us will mind our own business and make the world a better place.
I thought they loved porn?
Just lost the Incel vote
I’m sure they’re telling themselves that as soon as they pass this invasive law, their OWN porn-addictions will improve!
Why do I get the impression it was written by a bunch of incels who bemoan no women would want to sleep with them, or even let them peek at their naked bodies and so they decided if they can’t get any, no one can? 🤔
Uh, anyone think it’s suspect he has such an interest in Photography (see pic)?
“If they got rid of porn there’d be one website left and it’d be called ‘bring back the porn'”- Perry Cox, MD.
They want to redefine lifestyles they don’t agree with as “porn”, and then persecute anyone who doesn’t espouse their approved lifestyle. That’s what this is about.
The same authors and supporters of Project 2025 are the same people who get caught committing the very acts they want to ban.
That could be anything from actual porn to a girl showing her ankles in public.
Yea, it was never about ACTUALLY banning porn. They love porn, as most people probably do, but it’s a code for: “loophole we can use to imprison and exterminate the LGBT+ community.”