Swiss employees less protected from AI risks than in the EU

Article:

>__In Switzerland, artificial intelligence (AI) is already being used to boost companies’ profits and productivity. However, employees face fewer protections from the associated risks compared to other European countries.__

>Artificial intelligence (AI) makes it possible to work more productively, save costs and increase earnings. This is according to several reports and surveys. In a recent survey by the consultancy EY,  81% of the managers in Switzerland who took part in the survey said they had successfully used AI to save costs and increase profits. This percentage puts Switzerland in the lead in Europe when it comes to transforming work through AI, according to EY.

>The survey also shows that Swiss workers are among the least worried about losing their jobs to AI.

>But can workers really sleep soundly and not worry about the risks of AI? Algorithm Watch CH highlighted some shortcomings of the Swiss legal system and the protection of employees from the effects of AI in areas such as recruitment, productivity control or monitoring.

>According to the non-profit organisation based in Zurich and Berlin, discriminatory databases or systems that increase productivity, for example, can lead to inequality and worsen people’s mental health. But it is difficult to prove and contest such discrimination as the legal instruments currently available in Switzerland are weak, says Angela Müller, director of Algorithm Watch CH. Müller argues that Swiss lawmakers should strengthen individual and collective workers’ rights because AI works at scale and affects large groups of people. “Currently it is not easy to go to court as a collective group,” she says.

>__More work, more stress because of AI__

>Unlike other European countries, Switzerland has a rather liberal labour law. Employers have certain freedoms when it comes to dismissing staff, for example. They are under no obligation to inform and consult employees on the use of new technologies if these do not have a direct impact on their health and safety. In contrast, employees in Germany are actively involved in decision-making processes by being represented on management boards.

>In Switzerland, when AI is introduced in the workplace, employees are usually not consulted, says Isabelle Wildhaber, a professor of labour law at the University of St Gallen. “This is despite the fact that AI often has repercussions for the health and safety of staff,” the jurist points out. Wildhaber gives the examples of psychological distress or burnout due to increased productivity or the feeling of “being watched”.

>While generative AI tools such as ChatGPT allow people to work more efficiently, it can also lead to an increase in daily tasks and stress, says Thomas Wälti. Wälti is an ICT service manager who has been working for the Swiss telecommunications giant Swisscom for the past 23 years. He has already noticed that the number of his daily tasks has multiplied in the last two years. “Everything is very fast, you go from one task to the next,” he says. Where he needed four hours to prepare a PowerPoint presentation, he now only needs one thanks to tools like ChatGPT. Equally, employer’s expectations are rising.

>“Companies are demanding more and more, because technology allows it,” says Wälti.  Wälti says that he performs so many different tasks every day that he sometimes struggles to summarise his day to his children at dinner. “I look in the mirror and ask myself, ‘What did I really do today?’ The quality of work suffers.”

>The Swiss union for the communications and media industries, Syndicom, called for greater protections for the physical and mental integrity of workers in a position paper. “Switzerland lags behind Europe in the regulation of new technologies. But the more accessible and cheaper AI becomes, the greater the impact on the workforce,” says Daniel Hügli, a member of Syndicom’s steering committee. That is why workers’ participation must be strengthened to ensure they are in the loop, adds Hügli.

>__The workforce in Europe is better protected than in Switzerland__

>Workers in the European Union (EU) seem to be better protected against AI risks than those in Switzerland. This spring, the EU passed the world’s first regulation on artificial intelligence that imposes strict rules for the use of AI systems that are considered high-risk, for example in the area of personnel administration or access to employment.

>Furthermore, the General Data Protection Regulation GDPR prohibits, with a few exceptions, fully automated decisions, i.e. made by algorithms without any human intervention. However, such decisions are acceptable under Swiss law if the data subject is informed.

>Some Swiss companies developing and deploying AI systems are already taking measures to comply with European regulations. Swisscom is among them. “AI is very important to us. We want to be ready,” says Anne Sophie Morand, a lawyer and data governance counsel at Swisscom. “Every AI system that is prohibited under EU law will also be prohibited at Swisscom,” says Morand.

>According to Morand, AI systems that are used in HR require special attention since they can make decisions on personnel. “If you implement an AI system that concerns the lives of employees or potential employees it must be checked carefully in advance,” she says. Swisscom continues to rely on human employees when recruiting; the risk of overlooking good candidates would be too great. “I think there are not many high-risk AI systems in Swiss companies at this time. But there might be in the future,” says Morand.

>__Unaware and uninformed personnel__

>However, staff are often not fully aware of the AI functionalities hidden in the programmes they use on a daily basis. Communication and collaboration platforms such as those from Microsoft are capable of analysing data on staff activities and making predictions on burnout risks.

>For example, Microsoft Teams can provide statistics on meeting attendance or presence at the computer, the number of messages and chats initiated and many other activities. These functions are often active in software used in Switzerland, even though the monitoring of staff behaviour is prohibited by law.

>For these reasons, lawmakers in Switzerland should oblige companies to inform and consult staff before implementing algorithmic systems that may have an impact on employee health and safety, reads the legal report that Isabelle Wildhaber wrote on behalf of Algorithm Watch and the Syndicom trade union. “It is never a good idea not to involve employees,” says Wildhaber. Wildhaber thinks that many risks posed by AI could be reduced if employers would involve employees more in the company’s decisions. This would also help create trust and increase the acceptance of new systems.

>Wildhaber thinks that workers’ fear of losing their jobs is justified. For this reason, they should keep up with technological development because companies will look out for candidates who know how to use AI, she says. “These people will be the best equipped in the future.”

The classic technical progress. Yeah, unfortunately work will be more stressful due to ai but people will get good at working with ai and the stress will go away and productivity will increase. Imagine the first industrial robot programmers how fricking stressed they were to program giant robot arms to move 1 tone of car with high precision using a robot that (at that time) costed more than their house. Now it is just a normal engineering job.
Honestly the worst for people and businesses will be when open ai has a 10 min outage or something. Improvements in llama and local llm and local AI will be highly appreciated.

The cyber security office in CH was created last year. There is a hope. Also the legislation has improved.