I thought I needed to read different opinions today, so I found this article: https://lrt.lt/naujienos/nuomones/3/2268971/arturas-tereskinas-kas-bijo-lyties
A couple of thoughts: Why people are supportive "genderism theory" think the vast majority of politicians are doing everything against them? He writes the article himself "However, Butler reminds us that these questions, wrapped in the concept of gender, also signal a larger problem – the global strengthening of authoritarianism.", more such similar quotes can be found in the article itself. From my point of view, it’s just a different way of looking at people, maybe through social genders or some other groups of people. We discuss in more detail and see what it means and what can be gained from it as a benefit in society. But it seems that if you do not fully agree with these assumptions, you are classified as a person who "strengthens authoritarianism".
The article says "Yes, that’s what all this anti-gender rhetoric is about. Extreme right-wing political forces, including the Catholic Church, lustfully want to limit the rights of women, children and families, justifying the fact that in this way they supposedly prevent harm to others due to the concept of gender." How does it happen here that if you don’t support gender roles, you are against children, women and everything else, what is missing is to add poverty, hunger, modernism, free economy…
This is how it seems that people with gender stereotypes are themselves the extreme left (if I correctly identify them according to left-right), they blame everyone else who does not agree with their stereotypes as ultra conservatives who are already going to authoritarianism… And another, or I live in a bubble, but it seems that to no one looks at them with such opposition as they do. No one fights with them and no one wants to refuse to accept them or just try to take away the rights of children and women. It’s just a new social way of looking at people, new social groups according to a certain point of view. According to which there are more groups to which people can assign themselves. Where is the benefit to society, that is the question. Should the established norms be changed according to the new discussion discourse – I don’t think so. Am I missing something here?
https://i.redd.it/qz8e9awykr0d1.jpeg
Posted by shuldu