These rationale sound like clear 1st Amendment & Arbitrary/Capricious violations if the board is ever able to circumvent the “federal activity” designation.
somewhat_brave on
It seems like they may have opened themselves up to lawsuits with that statement.
TS_76 on
At some point musk will be forced from the company. Between his drug use, political affiliations, and just general weirdness he will start to effect the finances of the company. Same with Tesla, but to a lesser degree..
SpaceX is now a critical national security asset and it can’t be run by a lunatic.
reddit-suave613 on
> Military officials argue that launches by SpaceX, a leading contractor at Vandenberg Space Force Base, should be considered a federal activity because all of its launches benefit military objectives, regardless of whether the payloads being carried by the rockets are for the government or for Musk’s private satellite internet company, Starlink.
>
> As such, Space Force officials don’t have to obtain a permit or permission from the California Coastal Commission for rocket launches; they only need to reach an agreement to mitigate the effects.
>
> But commissioners in recent months have questioned whether SpaceX launches, **which carry private Starlink equipment on up to 87% of their flights**, should be considered private activity. That would mean that Musk’s company would have to obtain permission from the California agency for launches carrying private equipment.
I think the commissioners have a fair point here. You can literally spin any launch as a ‘benefit to military objectives’, the military are over stepping and need to be reigned in.
ninjahosk on
Space launch should be controlled exclusively by the federal government with keeping regional impacts in mind. International law as it stands really doesn’t allow for anything else. The California Coastal Commission can kick rocks. (I currently live on that coast and they actually do great work but still)
5 Comments
These rationale sound like clear 1st Amendment & Arbitrary/Capricious violations if the board is ever able to circumvent the “federal activity” designation.
It seems like they may have opened themselves up to lawsuits with that statement.
At some point musk will be forced from the company. Between his drug use, political affiliations, and just general weirdness he will start to effect the finances of the company. Same with Tesla, but to a lesser degree..
SpaceX is now a critical national security asset and it can’t be run by a lunatic.
> Military officials argue that launches by SpaceX, a leading contractor at Vandenberg Space Force Base, should be considered a federal activity because all of its launches benefit military objectives, regardless of whether the payloads being carried by the rockets are for the government or for Musk’s private satellite internet company, Starlink.
>
> As such, Space Force officials don’t have to obtain a permit or permission from the California Coastal Commission for rocket launches; they only need to reach an agreement to mitigate the effects.
>
> But commissioners in recent months have questioned whether SpaceX launches, **which carry private Starlink equipment on up to 87% of their flights**, should be considered private activity. That would mean that Musk’s company would have to obtain permission from the California agency for launches carrying private equipment.
I think the commissioners have a fair point here. You can literally spin any launch as a ‘benefit to military objectives’, the military are over stepping and need to be reigned in.
Space launch should be controlled exclusively by the federal government with keeping regional impacts in mind. International law as it stands really doesn’t allow for anything else. The California Coastal Commission can kick rocks. (I currently live on that coast and they actually do great work but still)