>barring UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres from entering the country for his failure to “unequivocally condemn” Iran’s massive missile attack on Israel.
Guterres is a terror supporting clown at this point honestly
Dofolo on
The friend of my enemy is not my friend, seems fair enough.
[deleted] on
[deleted]
Such_Lobster1426 on
Guterres will claim that he had no idea Iran attacked Israel.
The same way Lazzarini said he had no idea UNRWA employed a Hamas leader. After he was told multiple times.
Deepwithdeepthoughts on
Banning an enemy’s friend is a good idea
when_beep_and_flash on
He wouldn’t go to Israel. He’ll stay in New York drinking wine with sheikhs and commissars after another successful day calling for ceasefire on behalf of terrorists.
INVADER_BZZ on
I don’t remember any other UN Secretary, that has been as obviously biased, irrelevant and actually damaging for UN image (if it’s even possible anymore) as this clown. At least i don’t remember one like this one from the last 30 years.
theshynik on
Wonder, why he goes to Israel, no to Iran.Â
Why he do nothing regarding 101 civilian israelian hostagesÂ
Why why
Halunner-0815 on
I don’t think that’s wise, but I can fully understand the sentiment. Guterres repeatedly failed to condemn the terror attacks and the tactics of Hamas and Hezbollah. His neutrality is.more than doubtful.
Darkone539 on
Honestly, seems fair. If Israel had done this they would be condemned.
The un needs to keep states on side, but walking that line has gone too far into appeasement. An attack is an attack.
Badbrains8 on
This guy has been extremely bias since the start of the conflict. Surprised he wasn’t banned a long time ago
Altruistic-Key-369 on
Wars and sanctions have happened for less, wtf.
Dint destroy the credibility of the UN so publically. Jesus the west is losing its god damn mind..
gideonboxer on
Tell me he’s on Iran’s payroll, without telling me he’s on Iran’s payroll.
13 Comments
>barring UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres from entering the country for his failure to “unequivocally condemn” Iran’s massive missile attack on Israel.
Guterres is a terror supporting clown at this point honestly
The friend of my enemy is not my friend, seems fair enough.
[deleted]
Guterres will claim that he had no idea Iran attacked Israel.
The same way Lazzarini said he had no idea UNRWA employed a Hamas leader. After he was told multiple times.
Banning an enemy’s friend is a good idea
He wouldn’t go to Israel. He’ll stay in New York drinking wine with sheikhs and commissars after another successful day calling for ceasefire on behalf of terrorists.
I don’t remember any other UN Secretary, that has been as obviously biased, irrelevant and actually damaging for UN image (if it’s even possible anymore) as this clown. At least i don’t remember one like this one from the last 30 years.
Wonder, why he goes to Israel, no to Iran.Â
Why he do nothing regarding 101 civilian israelian hostagesÂ
Why why
I don’t think that’s wise, but I can fully understand the sentiment. Guterres repeatedly failed to condemn the terror attacks and the tactics of Hamas and Hezbollah. His neutrality is.more than doubtful.
Honestly, seems fair. If Israel had done this they would be condemned.
The un needs to keep states on side, but walking that line has gone too far into appeasement. An attack is an attack.
This guy has been extremely bias since the start of the conflict. Surprised he wasn’t banned a long time ago
Wars and sanctions have happened for less, wtf.
Dint destroy the credibility of the UN so publically. Jesus the west is losing its god damn mind..
Tell me he’s on Iran’s payroll, without telling me he’s on Iran’s payroll.