47 Comments

  1. This is probably some kind of Russian hybrid operation. It’s not technically difficult to solve the problem safely, the cargo can for instance be loaded on barges so the vessel can repaired. But whoever is giving orders to the captain doesn’t want that to happen.

  2. Aggravating_Set_8861 on

    It will seriously fck shit up if we, allow it.

    Mark my words: people will be like, “oh my gosh, wtf happened?”

    I am saying that political systems are trying to put this into a way of destroying a city/port in the western world.

    Otherwise, confiscate the ship now and put it in the middle of nowhere.

  3. Russia created the problem, Russia can resolve the problem.

    However, I do have sympathy for the crew as they are likely just pawns in this situation.

  4. Seems like the best course of action is to move the vessel as far away from anywhere it could cause harm, extract the crew and/or passengers, and then destroy the ship in international waters. This is assuming the ship can’t just go back to Russia where it came from.

    That amount of ammonium nitrate it’s carrying could take out a port–we’re talking Beirut but orders of magnitude higher–and given both Russia’s and PRC’s political warfare operations the past decade+, I don’t think any NATO member has any reason to take at face value that this isn’t a ruse to blow up NATO infrastructure.

  5. Excellent_Belt3159 on

    With Putin’s posturing & threats since the Ukraine war why would any port take the chance?

  6. Aggravating_Set_8861 on

    I cannot express how serious this can be, if detonated in the right place. We are all reactionary anyways, but I hope I am wrong.

  7. b-a-n-n-e-r_m-a-n on

    [The Texas City Disaster of 1947](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas_City_disaster) started with a ship carrying 2,300 tons of this material. This ship is reported to be carrying 20,000 tons.

    “At 9:12 a.m., the ammonium nitrate reached an explosive threshold from the combination of heat and pressure. Grandcamp detonated, causing utter destruction within 2,000 feet and extreme damage throughout the port. The tremendous blast produced a 15 ft (4.6 m) tsunami and a shockwave, levelling nearly 1,000 buildings on land. Among the buildings destroyed was a Monsanto Chemical Company plant, killing 145 of its 450 workers.
    Flying shrapnel resulted in ignition of refineries and chemical tanks along the waterfront. Falling bales of burning twine from Grandcamp’s cargo added to the damage, and her anchor was hurled across the city. Two sightseeing airplanes flying nearby were blown out of the sky, while 8 miles (13 km) away, half of the windows in Galveston were shattered. The explosion blew the almost 6,350 short tons (5,760 t) of the ship’s steel into the air, some at supersonic speed.”

  8. They tried to dock at Klaipeda but they were refused. Klaipeda being the LNG terminal for the Lithuanian power grid that ended their reliance on Russian gas imports. Funny that huh.

  9. I say we drag it out to the deep sea and nuke the entire ship from orbit. It’s the only way to be sure.

  10. Rescue the crew and scuttle the damn thing while it’s still in open water. We are in a war whether we want to announce it or not. Letting a 20000 ton* bomb from an enemy country dock in a UK city would be insane.

    Edit: wrote LBS not ton

  11. Josepth_Blowsepth on

    Send out the Nikolay Chiker tugboat. It’s not busy hauling the Admiral Kuznetsov back to port. Maybe Ukraine will help them both accelerate via space reentry once it’s in Russian territory

  12. IndistinctChatters on

    On 22nd August 2024 Ruby MV* took shelter in the Norwegian city of Tromso for repairs, where six deficiencies including a cracked hull, unlawful fuel, various safety issues and expired crew documents were discovered

    Jens Wenzel Kristoffersen, a defence analyst at Nordic Defense Analysis and a former naval officer, questioned why the ship had not been ordered to return to Russia.

    “The amount of AM on this Russian boat is 10x this and would be equivalent explosive power to one of Putin’s tactical nuclear weapons – this vessel should be treated with kid gloves and returned to Russia asap –  in normal times this would be a concern but not a national threat but as Putin has yet again threatened the UK with attack and nuclear level attack there must be an urgency to get this ship well away from the UK.”

    Edit:*

  13. It’s very suspicious that it directly went to a Norwegian Navy base and then a NATO facility to try to dock instead of a civilian port. At this point it needs to be seized, taken out to international waters and detonated.

  14. She’s not too far away from a well known wreck which has about 1400 tons of unstable ordnance just for that extra bit of concern.

  15. I knew someone once who acted like butter wouldn’t melt in their mouth, but on the sly would steal, snoop, undermine and damage property of people they otherwise acted like friends with. After noticing this and reflecting on the pattern, I never let them into my house again.

  16. “Something big is going to happen in October.”

    Any country try that let’s this thing within 100 miles of their coastline is fucking nuts. Its a floating Russian mini nuke with plausible deniability.

  17. The article doesn’t state the original destination port nor exactly why it can’t go there. I’m just curious why this ship was loaded up with so much ammonium nitrate. Someone must have wanted it. Was it China? (That is not a dig on China – they have a lot of people to feed and this is used as fertilizer when it’s not exploding.)

  18. FuckKarmeWhores on

    This ship has been at it for weeks, scaring plenty of countries. Only positive thing is that it’s pretty hard to get it to explode.

  19. I hope Uk authorities will have a bit of back bone and say Fuk no if they request to unload in UK port.

  20. General_Benefit8634 on

    Force it to Malta. The ship is registered there. Maybe this will cause a change in the way they exploit foreign owned ship registration for tax / revenue purposes?

  21. If it was near Klaipeda and now it’s east of UK, it had to pass one of Danish straits. That was a perfect place for explosion and yet it didn’t happen.

  22. Send it to the middle of nowhere, offload crew and blow the ship.

    Political and legal nightmare you say ? Well less of a nightmare then blowing up in or near any modern port.

    Just my opinion.