U.S. State Department should really give Israel the reward money for taking the bastard out.
Haunting-Donut-7783 on
Israel is doing the whole world favor after favor.
foxman666 on
>“That said, we have disagreements with the Israelis on tactics and how you kind of measure escalation risk. It is a very concerning situation,” he further added. “I’m very confident that through diplomacy, through deterrence and other means, we’ll work our way out of it.”
Empty words. People have to live displaced or in fear of getting bombed and we’re supposed to try diplomacy with people who openly flaunt their intentions to destroy us?
>”We do not think a war in Lebanon is the way to achieve the objective, to return people to their homes. We also fully stand with Israel in their defense of their people and their territory against Hezbollah,” McGurk continued. “We want a diplomatic settlement to the north. That is the objective, and that’s what we’re working towards.”
Right, war in Lebanon isn’t the way, simply because the head of the snake is not there. Iran is the problem, and they will create new proxies even if Hizbullah is gone. But again western powers aren’t willing to do anything as long as it’s someone else who has to pay the price.
NyriasNeo on
““That said, we have disagreements with the Israelis on tactics and how you kind of measure escalation risk.”
Lol … that is just stupid. Whenever you take out thousands of terrorists, whatever tactics you use, it is “escalation” by definition. So the question is …. do you want those terrorists gone or not?
5 Comments
Arch terrorist? Not Super Terrororist?
U.S. State Department should really give Israel the reward money for taking the bastard out.
Israel is doing the whole world favor after favor.
>“That said, we have disagreements with the Israelis on tactics and how you kind of measure escalation risk. It is a very concerning situation,” he further added. “I’m very confident that through diplomacy, through deterrence and other means, we’ll work our way out of it.”
Empty words. People have to live displaced or in fear of getting bombed and we’re supposed to try diplomacy with people who openly flaunt their intentions to destroy us?
>”We do not think a war in Lebanon is the way to achieve the objective, to return people to their homes. We also fully stand with Israel in their defense of their people and their territory against Hezbollah,” McGurk continued. “We want a diplomatic settlement to the north. That is the objective, and that’s what we’re working towards.”
Right, war in Lebanon isn’t the way, simply because the head of the snake is not there. Iran is the problem, and they will create new proxies even if Hizbullah is gone. But again western powers aren’t willing to do anything as long as it’s someone else who has to pay the price.
““That said, we have disagreements with the Israelis on tactics and how you kind of measure escalation risk.”
Lol … that is just stupid. Whenever you take out thousands of terrorists, whatever tactics you use, it is “escalation” by definition. So the question is …. do you want those terrorists gone or not?