“The magazine made its first-ever endorsement of President Biden in 2020.”
plz-let-me-in on
> This is only the second time in the magazine’s 179-year history that it has made an endorsement in a presidential race.
> The magazine made its first-ever endorsement of President Biden in 2020.
This is only the second time ever that *Scientific American* has endorsed a candidate in a presidential election in its 179-year history, once again endorsing the candidate running against Donald Trump. While this is pretty historical, it probably isn’t a huge surprise: Kamala Harris is the only candidate in this race who actually believes in science.
Worried_Quarter469 on
Scientific American magazine announced Monday that it was endorsing Vice President Kamala Harris in the 2024 race, citing her plans to improve the nation’s health care system, fight climate change and support reproductive rights.
[article has more in depth]
sugarlessdeathbear on
Thanks to Trump all kinds of people and entities that would not normally make a political endorsement are doing so.
KidKilobyte on
Science is the pursuit of Truth, Trump is the antithesis of this.
BoringFloridaMan on
You can probably count on zero fingers how many Trump supporters read SA.
specklebrothers on
No Scientific American endorsement
No Wall Paid for By Mexico
No Lock her Up
No Hunter in jail
No second term
No help from Supreme Court
No court cases won
No proud boys
No 2024
So much losing !
autotldr on
This is the best tl;dr I could make, [original](https://www.axios.com/2024/09/16/scientific-american-kamala-harris-2024) reduced by 64%. (I’m a bot)
*****
> Scientific American magazine announced Monday that it was endorsing Vice President Kamala Harris in the 2024 race, citing her plans to improve the nation's health care system, fight climate change and support reproductive rights.
> Zoom in: The editors went on to compare Harris and Trump's records and proposed policies across health care, gun safety, reproductive rights, climate and technology.
> State of play: The Scientific American is just the latest influential endorsement for Harris.
Can wait for Trump to post his hate for science. Which we already knew.
dreaganusaf on
Harris compared to the anti science, anti public health, seditious insurrectionist felon…it’s not a difficult choice.
Suspicious-Pay-5474 on
Nerds know
mok000 on
I HATE SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN!
(Unlikely) Donold Trump posting on TS.
i-love-freesias on
Very cool!
BoomerE30 on
Unfortunately this will not reach any trump voters
fungobat on
>Harris “offers the country better prospects, relying on science, solid evidence and the willingness to learn from experience,” the magazine’s editors wrote.
>”She pushes policies that boost good jobs nationwide by embracing technology and clean energy. She supports education, public health and reproductive rights” and “treats the climate crisis as the emergency it is.”
cobaltjacket on
It would probably shock no one that science & medicine types are overwhelmingly anti-Trump.
pythonwarg on
The first time they endorsed a candidate it was Biden. He turned out to be the worst President in history, and mentally unfit to run for a second term.
17 Comments
“The magazine made its first-ever endorsement of President Biden in 2020.”
> This is only the second time in the magazine’s 179-year history that it has made an endorsement in a presidential race.
> The magazine made its first-ever endorsement of President Biden in 2020.
This is only the second time ever that *Scientific American* has endorsed a candidate in a presidential election in its 179-year history, once again endorsing the candidate running against Donald Trump. While this is pretty historical, it probably isn’t a huge surprise: Kamala Harris is the only candidate in this race who actually believes in science.
Scientific American magazine announced Monday that it was endorsing Vice President Kamala Harris in the 2024 race, citing her plans to improve the nation’s health care system, fight climate change and support reproductive rights.
[article has more in depth]
Thanks to Trump all kinds of people and entities that would not normally make a political endorsement are doing so.
Science is the pursuit of Truth, Trump is the antithesis of this.
You can probably count on zero fingers how many Trump supporters read SA.
No Scientific American endorsement
No Wall Paid for By Mexico
No Lock her Up
No Hunter in jail
No second term
No help from Supreme Court
No court cases won
No proud boys
No 2024
So much losing !
This is the best tl;dr I could make, [original](https://www.axios.com/2024/09/16/scientific-american-kamala-harris-2024) reduced by 64%. (I’m a bot)
*****
> Scientific American magazine announced Monday that it was endorsing Vice President Kamala Harris in the 2024 race, citing her plans to improve the nation's health care system, fight climate change and support reproductive rights.
> Zoom in: The editors went on to compare Harris and Trump's records and proposed policies across health care, gun safety, reproductive rights, climate and technology.
> State of play: The Scientific American is just the latest influential endorsement for Harris.
*****
[**Extended Summary**](http://np.reddit.com/r/autotldr/comments/1fihi3r/scientific_american_makes_secondever_endorsement/) | [FAQ](http://np.reddit.com/r/autotldr/comments/31b9fm/faq_autotldr_bot/ “Version 2.02, ~693938 tl;drs so far.”) | [Feedback](http://np.reddit.com/message/compose?to=%23autotldr “PM’s and comments are monitored, constructive feedback is welcome.”) | *Top* *keywords*: **Trump**^#1 **Harris**^#2 **editors**^#3 **reproductive**^#4 **magazine**^#5
Can wait for Trump to post his hate for science. Which we already knew.
Harris compared to the anti science, anti public health, seditious insurrectionist felon…it’s not a difficult choice.
Nerds know
I HATE SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN!
(Unlikely) Donold Trump posting on TS.
Very cool!
Unfortunately this will not reach any trump voters
>Harris “offers the country better prospects, relying on science, solid evidence and the willingness to learn from experience,” the magazine’s editors wrote.
>”She pushes policies that boost good jobs nationwide by embracing technology and clean energy. She supports education, public health and reproductive rights” and “treats the climate crisis as the emergency it is.”
It would probably shock no one that science & medicine types are overwhelmingly anti-Trump.
The first time they endorsed a candidate it was Biden. He turned out to be the worst President in history, and mentally unfit to run for a second term.