The end of the article is pretty hard on ESA for taking two weeks to release the results.. saying that it *”call(s) into question ESA’s stated commitment to transparency”*.
Is anyone *actually* worried about two weeks of time, or is this just a news agency stirring up drama? Maybe my viewpoint is skewed by the selective and labored pace of Starliner updates from NASA… but two weeks, for something so significant, really doesn’t seem that bad for putting a press release together and verifying the content before publication.
2 Comments
Extremely good news that the cause has been found
The end of the article is pretty hard on ESA for taking two weeks to release the results.. saying that it *”call(s) into question ESA’s stated commitment to transparency”*.
Is anyone *actually* worried about two weeks of time, or is this just a news agency stirring up drama? Maybe my viewpoint is skewed by the selective and labored pace of Starliner updates from NASA… but two weeks, for something so significant, really doesn’t seem that bad for putting a press release together and verifying the content before publication.