>South Africa is required to submit its evidence by October 28. However, it is now attempting to obtain a few more months, the report noted.
The article writes about South Africa’s allegations against Israel in the ICJ UN court. It seems that the deadline to give evidence of the “Genocide” they claim is happening is taking more time than expected.
Which is odd considering this “Genocide” is going on for about a full year now, with thousands of aid workers on site and pretty much uninterrupted internet and smartphone footage coming out of there.
actsqueeze on
Why is this the only article I can find on this, and it doesn’t source any of its claims?
It cites a “lack of evidence” but then doesn’t say where that information came from or provide any pertinent links. Seems a bit short on information
StuTaylor on
South African here.
There were a number of reasons for South Africa to lay the charges of genocide.
There were National elections coming up, the ruling ANC was facing defeat and was aiming for the large Muslim vote.
The ANC will back anyone who is anti-USA
South Africa has close relations with Iran and Russia
Reasons for the delay in preventing evidence is either there is no evidence or more than likely the ANC is incapable of doing anything in a reasonable amount of time. Things most countries will do in a month will take South Africa a year.
St_BobbyBarbarian on
The ANC is corrupt and a clown show. There has never been a genocide in Israel and Palestine. One could argue ethnic cleansing in the sense of moving people, whether for 1948 or for current day settlements in WB. But there is no genocide
roydez on
Jerusalem Post is a shitty propaganda source. Is there any other source?
5 Comments
>South Africa is required to submit its evidence by October 28. However, it is now attempting to obtain a few more months, the report noted.
The article writes about South Africa’s allegations against Israel in the ICJ UN court. It seems that the deadline to give evidence of the “Genocide” they claim is happening is taking more time than expected.
Which is odd considering this “Genocide” is going on for about a full year now, with thousands of aid workers on site and pretty much uninterrupted internet and smartphone footage coming out of there.
Why is this the only article I can find on this, and it doesn’t source any of its claims?
It cites a “lack of evidence” but then doesn’t say where that information came from or provide any pertinent links. Seems a bit short on information
South African here.
There were a number of reasons for South Africa to lay the charges of genocide.
There were National elections coming up, the ruling ANC was facing defeat and was aiming for the large Muslim vote.
The ANC will back anyone who is anti-USA
South Africa has close relations with Iran and Russia
Reasons for the delay in preventing evidence is either there is no evidence or more than likely the ANC is incapable of doing anything in a reasonable amount of time. Things most countries will do in a month will take South Africa a year.
The ANC is corrupt and a clown show. There has never been a genocide in Israel and Palestine. One could argue ethnic cleansing in the sense of moving people, whether for 1948 or for current day settlements in WB. But there is no genocide
Jerusalem Post is a shitty propaganda source. Is there any other source?