Both of them are bad. But the second one is basically a UAE real estate project no?
The point of it to make money, not to really care about the cascade.
Even the commenters noted that the real estate should be destroyed. And another one mentions why do we have a cafe and a wall cinema… Which is also right.
I like the first one, at least it is trying to be original in what it is doing. And is a public space.
The second one is just generic Europe. But big.
Lopsided_Praline_548 on
I assume that whenever Cascade was being built, it was designed in its entirety. Therefore there must be some original plan on how it should look like in its final state.
What is the point of trying to be too smart, and coming up with new ideas on how to finish a project that is already 80% finished? Especially by an administration that has not shined with its taste or ability to execute major projects.
Just finish it as it was originally intended to be, and move forward. Simple job.
VMSstudio on
Both are absolute trash.
Datark123 on
It’s pretty obvious that the first building on the right has an illegal one story structure added on the roof. Really a shame that it was allowed in such a central location.
I really hope they take care of that one day, just like the illegal structures they demolish throughout the city.
obikofix on
FFS, could you invite some adequate architects from abroad to draw something better and realistic. And yeah, without a restaurant it’s not a real project, right ?
jacobelordi on
1st one looks so badass are people crazy, it looks like an actual continuation of the building
mrvl on
Unfortunately, only citizens registered in Yerevan can vote.
7 Comments
Both of them are bad. But the second one is basically a UAE real estate project no?
The point of it to make money, not to really care about the cascade.
Even the commenters noted that the real estate should be destroyed. And another one mentions why do we have a cafe and a wall cinema… Which is also right.
I like the first one, at least it is trying to be original in what it is doing. And is a public space.
The second one is just generic Europe. But big.
I assume that whenever Cascade was being built, it was designed in its entirety. Therefore there must be some original plan on how it should look like in its final state.
What is the point of trying to be too smart, and coming up with new ideas on how to finish a project that is already 80% finished? Especially by an administration that has not shined with its taste or ability to execute major projects.
Just finish it as it was originally intended to be, and move forward. Simple job.
Both are absolute trash.
It’s pretty obvious that the first building on the right has an illegal one story structure added on the roof. Really a shame that it was allowed in such a central location.
I really hope they take care of that one day, just like the illegal structures they demolish throughout the city.
FFS, could you invite some adequate architects from abroad to draw something better and realistic. And yeah, without a restaurant it’s not a real project, right ?
1st one looks so badass are people crazy, it looks like an actual continuation of the building
Unfortunately, only citizens registered in Yerevan can vote.