Aside from the topic that the article touches on. With this, I would just like to show how to recognize texts written by AI (chat-gpt) (I’m not saying that I don’t agree with what was written).
So, with slightly longer texts, chat-gpt tends to enumerate: "The problem is not simple; it is a complex result of historical, educational, religious and social factors" Enumerations of this nature are repeated throughout the article and are typical of this current version of chatgpt. In addition, the classic structure of the text appears, which is divided into chapters, smaller paragraphs and finally a conclusion in the same spirit.
Author of the article "Aurelie Nimarin" (I assume he is referring to Marcus Aurelius since his sculpture is in the middle of the text) so the author is anonymous. Some other articles written by the same author are normal, that is, there are no indications of AI intervention. That’s the only thing that’s a little strange to me. Otherwise, chatgpt can be adjusted to give a stylistically differently organized text that would add to the believability, but in this case they either didn’t know that or didn’t care.
I don’t know if people are interested in this topic at all, but here it is for those who may not be very knowledgeable (and don’t support AI as a whole) to know how to recognize texts written by AI.
Posted by DetectiveStraight747