Seems comparable to other sentences. I’m sure someone will be along soon to explain how this is still two tier policing though.
OddPair3555 on
A 58yr old woman who is a full time carer for her husband, who had no previous convictions or trouble with the police got 15 months for a Facebook comment.
This man got 14 months for punching someone, quite different if you ask me.
Ok_Dragonfruit_8102 on
Calling him “mosque defender” is like calling one of the far-right thugs “nation defender”
ZombieZoots on
By defender do they mean attacker?
guess so else there would be no jail
Whole_Pilot176 on
Why do they all look exactly like you’d expect them to look?
(This is a “parody” of the comments from the older white woman sentencing thread. Wonder if one is okay but the other isn’t…?)
Quicks1ilv3r on
This bloke who was actually violent got less time than the bloke who made ‘threatening gestures’ towards the police.
Sure doesn’t seem two-tier. /s
DrSpooglemon on
I think, given the circumstances, there are sufficient exculpatory factors to conclude that he simply took self-defense a little too far. At most he should have received a suspended sentence.
test_test_1_2_3 on
‘Mosque defender’ instead of the far more appropriate ’violent thug’ and people on this sub wonder why there’s people who feel there’s a two tier system underneath.
The far left here have picked apart far less obvious versions of biased reporting in the past but when it suits their agenda they don’t see the problem. Funny that.
Pollaso2204 on
“Mosque defender”?
I guess we can also call some of the racist rioters as “English culture defenders”?
9 Comments
Seems comparable to other sentences. I’m sure someone will be along soon to explain how this is still two tier policing though.
A 58yr old woman who is a full time carer for her husband, who had no previous convictions or trouble with the police got 15 months for a Facebook comment.
This man got 14 months for punching someone, quite different if you ask me.
Calling him “mosque defender” is like calling one of the far-right thugs “nation defender”
By defender do they mean attacker?
guess so else there would be no jail
Why do they all look exactly like you’d expect them to look?
(This is a “parody” of the comments from the older white woman sentencing thread. Wonder if one is okay but the other isn’t…?)
This bloke who was actually violent got less time than the bloke who made ‘threatening gestures’ towards the police.
Sure doesn’t seem two-tier. /s
I think, given the circumstances, there are sufficient exculpatory factors to conclude that he simply took self-defense a little too far. At most he should have received a suspended sentence.
‘Mosque defender’ instead of the far more appropriate ’violent thug’ and people on this sub wonder why there’s people who feel there’s a two tier system underneath.
The far left here have picked apart far less obvious versions of biased reporting in the past but when it suits their agenda they don’t see the problem. Funny that.
“Mosque defender”?
I guess we can also call some of the racist rioters as “English culture defenders”?