Any Armenians who play Age of Empires 2: DE (or familiar with), what are your thoughts on the historical depiction of Armenians in-game?

So Armenians as a civilization was released several months ago in Age of Empires 2: DE and since it’s release of the Mountain Royals expanion (which includes both Georgians and Armenians as playable civilizations), the Armenian civilization (AoE2 wiki link to the Armenian civilization for more details about them) depiction has been subjected to jokes within the AoE2 community for historical inaccuracy (the other joke with the AoE2 community is the Chinese not having access to two gunpowder units despite gunpowder being an obvious Chinese invention). As someone who’ve played Age of Empires 2 since childhood, I was personally excited that Armenians were finally added in AoE2 and are one of my most requested civilizations to be added into the game (alongside with Tibetans, Jurchens, etc., although those two will never be added in AoE2 because of Chinese censorship issues). However, I was disappointed that developers decided to make them an infantry/navy focused civilization in order differentiate from the Georgian civilization (who is depicted as a defensive and cavalry civilization).

That being said, I want to hear this community’s thoughts on the depiction of Armenians in the game for those who’ve played Age of Empires 2: DE (or at very least familiar with it). Here’s a few key historical discussions to bring up:

• As mentioned earlier, from what I’ve done research about medieval Armenia, medieval Armenia has a reputation of cavalry (more specifically heavy cavalry and cavalry archers) since the antiquity times, even to the point that Armenian kingdoms provided heavy cavalry and mounted archers as part of elite troops for the Sassanid Empire (source). In-game, however, the Armenians are depicted with very weak cavalry and mounted archers and instead are more focused on infantry and navy (the Armenians in-game have an Imperial Age unique tech that gives their non-Spearmen line infantry units +30 hit points and a civilization bonus where they can upgrade most of their infantry units an age earlier than their opponents). In fact, most of the civilization design is based on Cilician Armenia (which is reflected with several naval bonuses they have). And into the topic of Cilician Armenia, I’ve even read somewhere the Cilicia Armenia even adopted heavy cavalry equipment and tactics from Frankish crusaders at one point (hence further highlighting medieval Armenia’s tradition on cavalry) If anyone who has knowledge of medieval Armenian history, do you find this to be inaccurate or not?
• In terms of their architecture set, the Armenians use the Mediterranean architecture set (the same architecture used by the Byzantine, Romans, Italian, Spanish, and Portuguese civilizations), which the Georgian civilization also share (I’m assuming the developers used the Medieterranean set instead of making a unique "Caucasus" architecture set that could have been shared with the Georgians to reflect on Byzantine Empire’s influence on medieval Georgia and Armenia). However, ever since Lords of the West expansion, the DE expansion civilizations have their own unique Castle architecture alongside their obvious own unique Wonder (in the Armenian case, their Castle is based on Levoncle and their Wonder is the Etchmiadzin Cathedral). Do you find the choice of Castle, Wonder, and architecture feels appropriate for medieval Armenia or not?
• In terms of unique units, the Armenians have Composite Bowman) that they can train from the Castle, and the Warrior Priest) from the Fortified Church (a unique building shared with the Georgians). The former is a foot archer unit that can ignore pierce armor while the latter is a "warrior monk" type unit that can heal, take Relics, and engage in combat all in-one (but cannot convert units like a regular Monk in-game). The funny thing is that the attire the Warrior Priest wears happen to be one of the traditional attire of the Khevsur people in Georgia, yet this was given to Armenians for some reason. While I do heard about medieval Armenia having a reputation of archery from time to time, I didn’t hear anything Armenian clergy getting involved in military combat. Normally when people associate with "warrior monks"they often associate with the East Asian cultures (i.e. Chinese Shaolin monk and Japanese Ikko-Ikki). Can anyone give some historical insight regarding to the Warrior Priest and composite bowmen unique units (especially the former, because I felt this is kinda off for the Armenians) if they are historically accurate or not?
• In terms of a single-player campaign, the campaign focuses on Thoros IIwho was the sixth lord of Cilician Armenia. Do you him as fitting historical figure to represent medieval Armenia in Age of Empires 2, or do you think there are more fitting historical figures in medieval Armenia?

Anyways, if anyone have good insight about medieval Armenian history as well having played Age of Empires 2: Definitive Edition with the Armenian civilization, I wanted to hear the Armenian community’s thoughts and opinions on the depiction of the Armenian civilization as a whole in the game.